Abortion Research Group opposes state reporting requirements in lawmakers’ “weaponization”
The Trump administration’s “hostile political situation” means that the state “rethinks” mandatory abortion reporting requirements and “strove to oppose the new.” Abortion research Research Institute. But one pro-life activist told Fox News Digital that such a move would be a “serious mistake.”
Guttmacher Institute Policy Analysis Report It was concluded that it was released this month. Opposed abortion Policymakers will use the data of the outcomes to further limit abortion rights and access while also double the punitive approach to data collection. ”
“The establishment of abortion reporting requirements for purely political reasons and the increase in arms for patients and healthcare providers is a clear indication that this harm of compulsory data collection now outweighs its benefits,” a researcher from the Abortion Rights Group said. “To prevent further harm, Policymakers in All levels of government should work to remove existing reporting requirements and vehemently oppose the new ones, along with attempts to link federal funds to abortion reports. ”
FDA chief counsel defending abortion pill access under Biden will resign for two days
The Guttmacher Institute is urging nations to “rethink” the abortion reporting requirements required during the second Trump period.
Guttmacher is considered the gold standard for accurate abortion statistics as it provides more comprehensive data and receives more reports than the federal. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that instead of reporting in full, state policymakers should implement a voluntary form of data collection.
Prolife supporters oppose Guttmacher’s recommendations.
“It’s a serious mistake to roll back reports of nationally mandatory abortions,” Mia Stupert, a researcher at the Charlotte Rosier Institute of Life Support Research Group, said in a statement in Fox News Digital.
“Given that DOBBS has placed the authority to enact fetal protection in the hands of elected representatives at the federal and state level, it is important that good data be accessible so that they can assess the impact of their abortion policies.”
Clinton-era laws “weaponized” by Biden against Pro-Lifers must go, Pence Group urges house GOP
Reporting the number of abortions is important data for public policymakers, life support advocates say in response to the Guttmacher Institute. (Darin Oswald/Idaho Statesman/Tribune News Service by Getty Images.)
The normative practice of abortion data collection comes primarily from states that report their numbers to the CDC. The data is then compiled to provide a snapshot of the national abortion, the age of her mother, and how far she is. However, in most states, not all states need to report their numbers to abortion providers, hospitals, or other health care providers.
The Institute says that 46 states and the District of Columbia currently have mandatory abortion reports in some form. California, Maryland, Michigan and New Jersey do not require reporting.
“even CDC agrees According to Steupert, that accurate abortion data is important for public health in terms of measuring unintended pregnancy and tracking changes in clinical practice tracking.
Collected information Abortion report Although it varies by state, it generally includes details such as the names of the healthcare facilities and clinicians involved in abortion services. It also includes demographic data for those who had received an abortion, including age, race, ethnicity, marriage status, place of residence, pregnancy age, selected gestational age, and previous births.
Doctors looking at health care data on screen (Kurt “Cyberguy” Knutsson)
A spokesman for Guttmacher said in a statement to Fox News Digital: “The recommendation is not a discussion of the states that collect abortion data, but rather a discussion of how there is a discussion of risk and burden. It was collected. ”
“The end of government-mandated abortion reporting is consistent with the collection of strict and accurate abortion data. We strongly oppose the state to consider changing laws and regulations to switch to a voluntary model of data collection that can generate high-quality data while protecting patient and provider safety and privacy.
Project 2025 It refers to the policy blueprint by a conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, not the official Trump administration policy guide.
Click here to get the Fox News app
This report was made by the US Supreme Court. Almost three years after overturning Wade, a decision in 1973 guaranteed women’s right to abortion – many states have enacted abortion bans.
Trump administration It also rolled back the Biden-era executive order that funded the federal government and re-enacted the Hyde amendment.