Judge asks if Los Angeles troops violate the rally’s comitatus law

US District Judge Charles Breyer postponed the issuance of additional rulings and instead sought briefings from both sides by noon Monday.

The hearing took place the next day 9th Circuit Appeal Panel I granted the president To maintain control National Guard forces deployed in response to protests against the immigrant raid.

California Government Gavin Newsom In his appeal, he said “a violation of the Possemtitas Act is imminent, if not yet ongoing,” but Breyer postponed the allegations last week.

Vice President J.D. Vice President J.D. Vice President, a Marine Corps veteran, traveled to Los Angeles on Friday to meet with the military, including the US Marines deployed to protect federal buildings.

According to Vance, the court determined that Trump’s decision to send federal troops was “legal” and would do so again if necessary.

“The President will not send the National Guard because it is not necessary if you enforce your own laws, in every city, in every community, in any small or small city, and in protecting federal law enforcement.

Tours at Vance’s Multi-Agency Federal Joint Operations Center and Mobile Command Center were born as demonstrations settled after violent clashes and outbreaks between protesters and police. Vandalism And the invasion followed an attack by immigrants in Southern California earlier this month. Since June 8th, tens of thousands of people have marched peacefully in Los Angeles.

The National Guard has accompanied federal agents in several migrant attacks; Marines temporarily detained the man. On the first day they deployed to protect federal buildings. It was the first time a federal force had detained a civilian since its deployment in the second largest city.

Trump has allowed him to maintain control of the National Guard

Breyer discovered Trump acted illegally when the president stimulated soldiers over opposition from the California governor. However, the appeal decision stopped the judge’s decision Temporary restraint order. Breyer asked his attorney on Friday whether he or the appeal court would retain primary jurisdiction and grant the injunction under the Class Comitatus Act.

California is seeking a preliminary injunction to give Newsomback control of Los Angeles’ military forces, which has seen recent protests settle.

Republican Trump argued that the military was necessary to restore order. Democrat Newsom said it inflamed the presence, tensions on the streets of American cities, robbed local governments and wasted resources.

Los Angeles mayor lifts curfew after protests sink

demonstration It looks like it’s turningDozens of protesters appeared on Thursday, Dodger Stadiuma group of federal agents gathered in the parking lot, covered their faces and moved in SUVs and cargo vans. The Dodgers organization in Los Angeles asked them to leave, and they did.

Tuesday, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass We lifted downtown curfew It was first imposed in response to vandalism and conflict with police after crowds gathered at agents detaining immigrants.

Trump federal member of the California State Guard under authorities known as Title 10.

Title 10 allows the President to invite the National Guard to federal service if the President “is in a rebellion or danger against government authority” or when the President “cannot enforce US laws.”

Blayer found it Trump was stomping his legal authorityhe said the president would only allow the National Guard forces to be controlled during “rebellion or danger of rebellion.”

“The protests in Los Angeles are far below the “rebellion,” wrote Watergate prosecutor Breyer, a brother to Supreme Court Judge Stephen Breyer, appointed by President Bill Clinton and retired.

As the lawsuit progresses, the National Guard stays in the hands of the federal government.

The Trump administration argued that the courts cannot recertify the president’s decision. The appeals team would otherwise rule, saying the president had no free power to seize control of state security guards, but the panel said in this case, by citing the violence by protesters, the Trump administration provided sufficient evidence to provide a defensible basis for federalizing the military.

For now, the California State Guard will remain in the hands of the federal government as the lawsuit progresses. This is the first deployment by the president of the state National Guard without permission from the governor since 1965 the troops were sent to protect civil rights marchers.

Trump celebrated the appeal ruling in a social media post, calling it a “big victory,” suggesting more developments.

Newsom warns that if Trump can give way, California isn’t the last state to see the troops on the streets.