Legal experts analyze Diddy’s defense strategy in sex crime cases

Decisions based on Shawn: Diddy, Combs Legal experts say lawyers who stop calling for witnesses to testify in federal trials on sex offences stem from the prosecutor’s burden of reasonable doubt.

Diddy’s lawyer, Mark Agnifilo, showed in court Monday that the defense plans to consider evidence with the ju apprentice and would not require witnesses to testify on behalf of the rapper. The rapper’s legal team hopes to take a break from the lawsuit on Wednesday, with debates expected to begin the next day.

“Decision to call witnesses during a defense case is a calculated risk.” Criminal defense and civil lawyers Adanté Pointer He told Fox News Digital, a lawyer at People LLC.

Diddy defense is not expected to call witnesses in sex trafficking trials

“Not calling a witness means that the defense essentially tells the ju-degree that no one knows in the universe that can speak on Didi’s behalf to assist him in his defense. On the other hand, calling a witness can draw a questioning person and perhaps derive a testimony that will likely damage him,” depending on his interactions with the person and the knowledge of these women.

Pointer likened the defence decision not to call witnesses to “Pandora’s Box.”

“They’re not going to call given the defense signal One Witnessthey don’t think that a potential defense-friendly witness will bring Didi’s net profit. His lawyer essentially decided that juice was not worth squeezing. ”

Witness Missing and Prolonged Questions Diddy Trials are approaching conclusions, which plagues the prosecution: Experts

Judge Arun Subramanian Perhaps he would ask Didi to confirm his decision not to take a stand.

“Diddy’s testimony only allows prosecutors to speak out about their case and make the previous item of evidence a second or third time before the ju judge,” explained Poyter. “The prosecutor will go through all videos, texts and witness statements made against him at trial and will have a field day that forces Diddy to admit videos, receipts and bills, items recovered in his home or hotel room, and his attendance during the event described in his previous testimony.

“In light of the evidence already presented at trial, this would probably be an exciting and humiliating cross-examination, with kind prosecutors waiting to act for their entire career.”

Finishing the arguments of the trial that was launched May 5th Ju-search selectedis expected to start on Thursday after Diddy’s lawyer explained that it only takes two days to protect his client.

Trial Lawyer Tre Lovell To Fox News Digital, the defense wants to be doubled on reasonable doubt, and Diddy’s “exotic lifestyle” is not equivalent to what the prosecutor proposed, meaning “Diddy forms a criminal enterprise to please himself, and a baby oil tony soprano.”

Like what you’re reading? For more entertainment news click here

“The only reason you don’t call a witness in your defense is if you absolutely believe you have reasonable doubts and don’t want to do anything to take away from this, such as calling your own witness,” Lovell said. “It makes sense to call a psychiatrist to explain that Kathy and Jane’s actions are more reflective of a consensual relationship based on the autonomy each woman had, the benefits they received, and the love for Diddy.

“In addition, calling Bad Boy Entertainment executives will help distance businesses from Diddy’s more personal actions and dispel the elements of criminal enterprise. Finally, perhaps to help industry or legal experts distinguish between the “sex worker” and “prostitution” aspects to combat prostitution crimes.”

“However, the defense added that even calling witnesses like these could have a negative impact on reasonable doubts and chose not to do so,” said Lovell.

Mark ChakkouHe previously led the criminal division of the US Lawyer’s office in Detroit, and believed Diddy’s decision not to testify was “smart.”

“It’s really a big gamble to testify in such a case where the prosecution brought about assault charges. “By taking a stand, he would only have exposed himself to even worse conduct that was prohibited by the court. That was probably the right call.”

Click here to sign up for our Entertainment Newsletter

“Diddy’s decision not to testify can also be considered familiar, because he can say, “I had six weeks to look at the ju judge and the prosecution showed you, and there were six weeks to try to prove their case.” The defense attorney is going to say this. And in this case, the presumption of innocence will always remind the ju judge to go to Didi as the defendant.

Chutkow pointed out how the burden of proof lies with the government, not the founder of Bad Boy Records or his team.

“When you present a case, if you’re on the defense side, you’re better off because if it’s flattened, you might go back to some sort of marker and you might be in a worse position,” the lawyer said. “So, it’s often less sometimes. In a way, defense might be the opportunity to say, ‘No, we didn’t have to do it.’ ”

Watch: Legal experts explain Diddy’s defensive moves

With the lawsuit approaching more than seven weeks after the start of the lawsuit, and nine months after Diddy was arrested and charged, Chatkow thought both sides had done “what they were trying to achieve.”

“The prosecutor put all the evidence in. That’s not ruled out. But defense did an amazing job in cross-examination,” he said. “They bring a lot of additional communication between Didi and these other women, indicating that the relationship is more complicated.

“One of the things that prosecutors think they have to do in their final argument is basically, “Look, this isn’t like the case of human trafficking seen on TV. That’s not the case, there’s no situation where someone is being lured and taken away from their chains by an underground radiator. Essentially, it’s a golden cage.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

Chutkow said, “The other area they want to emphasize is the horrifying mail in this case. The use and threat of exposure on these tapes is to make women comply with the fact that women are elements of their own enforcement.

Comb has been charged Racketeering Conspiracy (Rico); Sex trafficking by force, fraud, or forced. and transport engaged in prostitution on September 17th under an unsealed federal complaint. Diddy has kept his innocence in the end.