House Republicans set voting records in the week of chaotic crypto law

House Republicans considered it “crypto week.”

GOP Leadership has fueled countless bills focusing on cryptocurrency regulation and non-regulation.

It was like a mysterious week.

“I’m tired of making history. I just want a normal assembly,” the House Speaker declared. Mike Johnsonr-la.

Trump’s modest spending reduction package will survive narrow Senate votes as some Republicans break the ranks

What Johnson mentioned was the House of Representatives, which opened a procedural vote to begin discussions on three crypto bills. However, due to a rebellion by conservatives in the House, the vote began last Wednesday at 1:19pm and ended at 11:04pm, making the House establish new records, the longest vote in history, of nine and 45 minutes. But the House previously established a new record of the longest vote earlier this month, when he was caught up in preparation for debate over a “big, beautiful bill.” The old record for voting was 7 hours and 31 minutes.

“They told me last night they set another record for opening votes and more. But it’s never a concern how long the votes are open. They have to get the right results,” Johnson said.

Mark Green has resigned from Congress and is now shrinking the GOP majority

week In the council It was more troublesome than a cold play concert.

Republicans were planning to move forward with the cryptography bill, but last Tuesday the House majority stumbled when conservatives barred measures to bring to the floor over many issues. Their resistance exploded the test vote, preventing the home from discussing the bill. The rebellion surprised GOP’s Brass, and it is said that Fox had infuriated President Donald Trump as he wanted to sign the law on one of the crypto bills by the end of last week.

Some of the rebels were driven to the White House on Tuesday night President Trump To sort out the issues – Johnson is taking part by phone.

So the house took the mulligan and tried again last Wednesday. However, the president and GOP leadership were unable to resolve the issue immediately, prompting a record-breaking role-call vote on Wednesday.

A majority of both parties regularly struggle to bring important bills to the floor. Therefore, the leader meets with his members to get the president involved.

But everything was not resolved.

You can’t really recant a single instance house Both party leaders faced an internal rebellion – then retry the next day – only to fail again. This is augmented by the president’s intervention.

However, the House was able to finally advance its crypto bills last Thursday afternoon. It cleared the way the House would move to the bill to withdraw funds that Congress has already approved the company for foreign aid and public broadcasting.

But it was a race against the watch.

Both Congressional groups had to revert their nails until 11:59:59pm on Friday night. Otherwise, the package would have been dead. If Republicans try again, it will face a Senate filibuster. Putting things together to cancel spending was a sprint. The Senate finally approved the bill last Thursday before 2:30am. The House was able to work with the Senate at 12:5:05am on Friday – after surprises about the cryptocurrency bill.

The Senate Pace – coupled with the crypto crisis in the house – did not help the problem.

House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries, DN.Y., had left Stemwinder, speaking earlier this month on the “big, beautiful bill.” On the morning of July 3rd, Jeffries spoke for 8 hours and 45 minutes. It’s the longest speech in the history of the house (remember what Johnson said about the history of building a house?). The house is still partially hampered by cryptocurrency stagnation, so did Jeffries get things up past Friday’s deadline?

First of all, such a scenario would require a tremendous amount of stamina from Jeffries. Yes, Sen. Cory Booker (DN.J.) established a new record of the longest speech in Senate history earlier this year. Booker spoke 25 hours and five minutes from March 31st to April 1st. But Senate rules have a senator who “questions” another senator. It’s like a basketball timeout. Booker recorded multiple “timeouts” as fellow Democrats stepped in for Booker and gave their own lengthy speeches. All they had to do was to declare what they said in question at the end. It helped Booker maintain the floor physically and debately.

There are no such “timeouts” in the house.

Most speeches in the house run for a minute. However, it is customary to show respect to the top leaders of both parties. Therefore, you may win a Speaker of the House, a minority leader, and sometimes what you call “magic minute.” The chairman doesn’t just strip off those leaders after a minute. They can speak as much as they want, but they You have to do what you talk about. They cannot be given to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (DN.Y.) or Sen. D-Conn. All of the members have the floor.

“Are you hoping tonight’s delay tactics will try to stop this?” I asked what’s really yours about Jeffries a few hours before the spending cancellation law came to the floor. “I set up a record with a speech just a few weeks ago.”

“We look forward to positive and robust discussions on the house floor so we can layout for Americans why Republicans continue to take steps to hurt them, rather than helping them,” Jeffries replied.

“So, aren’t you predicting the ‘magic portion’ like you did a few weeks ago? ” I followed up.

“I hope to be involved in the discussion,” Jeffries replied. “And I’m hoping to speak for more than a minute.”

It drew laughter from the Congressional press.

However, Lisa Desjardins from PBS Newshour were not made at Jeffries.

“To be clear, are you thinking of a speech that could be long enough (beyond deadlines)?” asked Deyaldin.

“I’m amazed at how much attention the ‘Magic Minute’ has been at this particular point,” Jeffries said.

“Well, the fate of all this money could come to it,” observed Desjardin.

At a press conference, Jeffries said he plans to meet with the Democratic candidate for New York City. Zorhan Mamdani That Friday. To date, Jeffries still does not support Mamdani – and caught Flak from the Liberal Party to not do so. Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumerdn.y., found myself in the pickles. Many Democrats believe that Mamdani is too free for the party, and believes that it could potentially sacrifice Democrats’ home seats in the 2026 mid-district.

After the press conference, a reporter’s compatriot chased Jeffries into the hall.

“What are your thoughts on whether or not you’re going to support it?” asked CBS’s Caitlyn Hueyburn.

“I’m looking forward to the conversation tomorrow. I’ll explore all the issues I just discussed with the Democratic candidate and take them from there,” Jeffries said.

Your trusted reporter asked Jeffries about what “signals are” he would support Mamdani or someone else.

“It was true of every famous approval decision I’ve made in the past, but I’ll have a sit-in conversation and then take it from there,” Jeffries replied.

I wondered if the confluence of spending reduction bills and Jeffries’ political difficulties might present him with a unique opportunity.

For more information about Fox Business, click here

“Would you like to use the magical portion to avoid having a meeting tomorrow?” I asked.

Jeffries left without responding, but those gathered in the hallways gathered at the Capitol agreed to the question.

Later that night, Jeffries spoke for 15 minutes on the spending cancellation bill. He met with Mamdani on Friday. And by Monday, he had not yet oppressed the New York mayor’s race.

Certainly mysterious.