Immediate payments are the new standard. Can the bank be maintained?


10 seconds. Under the SEPA Instant Payment (SEPA IP) initiative, it is now necessary to move money across the eurozone. Every day, every day, batch processing is a thing of the past.

Immediate SEPA payments have been around for eight years and the compliance deadline is looming, making transformation accelerating across EU institutions. The October requirement for outbound instant eurozone payments is a big catalyst. However, there is still a gap between regulatory requirements and operational realities as many European banks suffer from legacy infrastructure limitations, inconsistent user experiences, and incomplete 24/7 processing capabilities. Meanwhile, non-EU banks are pushing for expectations and modernizing their outdated systems.

Non-EU banks may have more time on paper, but the EU will offer non-Eurozone banks until 2027 and adhere to SEPA IPs in both sending and receiving payments, its breathing space can be false comfort. Regulatory delays should not be mistaken for strategic leeway. Customer expectations have already changed, and the clock is ticking.

Legacy systems are not designed for immediate payments. Historically, the banking system was operating comfortably on a batch processing schedule – downtime was predictable and maintenance windows were scheduled. The SEPA IP then came to eliminate such luxuries and mandated constant preparation that legacy systems could not maintain.

It’s not the only problem facing non-EU banks. Their infrastructure is often far away and is designed for payments during their own domestic opening hours. Banks have two gaps that require bridges. The technological cracks between current legacy capabilities and where it is needed, and the geographical disparity between business and clients. They must solve ways to bridge them without sacrificing daily services.

Minor adjustments to the legacy system are insufficient. Tearing old infrastructure and replacing it with the latest core is hardly possible despite its long-term benefits. So it’s a progressive approach that helps Banks fill these gaps. Gradual adjustments to SEPA IP’s 24/7 model and legacy systems should be a priority for non-EU banks quickly, allowing customers to quickly meet customer expectations and raise customer expectations without regulatory deadlines and massive disruptions.

Another consideration for non-EU banks is how real-time transactions fundamentally change liquidity management. The traditional liquidity framework, established around batch processes and fixed payment windows, is now facing obsolescence. However, many banks still manage their liquidity with manual processes and spreadsheets. This does not work with SEPA IP. Under this new system, the liquidity needs are immediate and continuous, and demanding dynamic management that legacy systems are not designed to accommodate.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *