AI Deepfark tricks Democrats because the law is behind the inappropriate use of “digital twins”


Join Fox News to access this content

Plus, use your account to get special access to selected articles and other premium content – free.

By entering your email and continuing, you agree to Fox News.” terms of service and Privacy Policyincluding us Financial Incentive Notification.

Please enter a valid email address.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) produces surreal “digital twins” such as politicians, celebrities, and pornographic materials. Deepfake Technology I’m struggling to decide on legal measures.

Dr. Eric Cole, a former CIA agent and cybersecurity expert, said Fox News Digital Poor online privacy practices and the willingness of people to post information publicly on social media makes them more susceptible to AI deepfakes.

“The cat hasn’t come out of the bag anymore,” he said.

“They have our photos, they know our kids, they know our families. They know where we live. And now, along with AI, they can take all the data about who we are, how we look, how we act, and basically we can create a digital twin,” Cole continued.

Keep these tips in mind and don’t be fooled by deepfakes generated by AI

Mark Zuckerberg's ai deepfake

AI-generated images, known as “deepfakes,” often involve editing videos or photos to make them look like others, or using your voice to make a statement that you have never spoken to in real life. (Elyse Samuels/The Washington Post/Lane Turner/The Boston Globe/Stefani Reynolds/AFP

He argued that the digital twin is so good that it is difficult to convey the difference between the artificial version and the real person on which the Deepfark is based.

Last month, a fraudulent audio clip of Donald Trump Jr. was distributed, suggesting that the US should send military equipment to Russia in place of Ukraine.

Posts It was widely discussed on social media and looked like a clip from an episode of the podcast, “Donald Trump Jr. and Trigger.”

Digital analytics experts later confirmed that Trump Jr.’s voice record was created using AI, noting that the technology became more “skilled and refined.”

factpostnews, an Official Democrats account, The audio was posted like the real thing. The account later deleted the recording. Another explanation, Republicans against Trump also posted a clip.

Over the past few years, many examples of AI deepfake have been used to mislead viewers engaged in political content. The 2022 video showed what’s up Ukrainian President Voldy Milzelensky Suspension to Russia – but the fake clips were made poorly and spread temporarily online.

President Donald Trump’s operation video and Former President Joe Biden He later appeared in preparation for the 2024 US presidential election. Based on existing videos, these clips often changed the words and behaviors of Trump and Biden.

AI-generated porn containing fake nudes of celebrities sticks to Etsy as a deepfake law “delayed”

Trump and Obama's ai deepfake

A woman from Washington, DC watches a video that was operated on January 24, 2019. This changes what is being said by President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama, showing how deepfake technology has evolved. (Rob Lever/AFP via Getty Images)

AI-generated images, known as “deepfakes,” often involve editing videos and photos to use AI to make them look like others. Deepfakes hit public radar in 2017 after Reddit users posted realistic looking porn from celebrities to the platform, using AI to make images look more persuasive, and as a result, opened the lock to ensure they are widely shared the following year.

Cole told Fox News Digital that he is his “worst enemy” about AI Deepfakes, and limiting online exposure may be the best way to avoid becoming a victim.

However, in politics and media where visibility is important, Public It becomes the main target for malicious AI use. Threat actors interested in replicating President Trump have plenty of feed to produce digital twin sucking data for US leaders in a variety of settings.

Congress should stop new AI tools used to exploit children

“Videos I can ride, how he walks, how he behaves, how he behaves, I can feed it to an AI model and make it a deepfake that is as realistic as President Trump.

In addition to assuming personal responsibility for removing personal data online quarterly, Cole said the law could be another way to reduce inappropriate use of AI.

Ted Cruzsens from R-Texas. D-Minn. The act of defeating it, It would be a federal crime that could make unconsensual intimate images public or threaten to publish. The bill passed unanimously through the Senate in early 2025, and Cruz said he believes it will be passed in the House before it becomes law in early March.

Melania Trump on the Hill

First Lady Melania Trump traveled to Capitol Hill on Monday to gather support to win a roundtable. (Fox News)

The proposed law would require a penalty penalty of up to three years in prison to share unconsensual intimate images involving minors and AI. It also requires a prison penalty of up to two and a half years for threat crimes involving minors, and a year and a year and a prison penalty for threats involving adults.

The bill also requires social media companies such as Snapchat, Tiktok and Instagram to delete such content in order to introduce procedures to remove such content within 48 hours of victims.

High school student, parents warned about the threat of Deepfark’s nude photo

First Lady Melania Trump gave her first speech at Capitol Hill earlier this month since returning to the White House, attending a roundtable meeting with lawmakers. Victim of revenge porn and AI-generated deepfakes.

“I’m with you today with a common goal to protect our young people from online harm,” Melania Trump said on March 3.

Eternos.Life co-founder and architect Andy Locascio (praved about building the first digital twin) said that the “Take it Down” act is a “Brainer,” but it is completely unrealistic to assume it is effective. He says that much of the AI ​​Deepfark industry is provided from locations not covered by US law, and the law is likely to affect only a small portion of websites that violate it.

Obama and Jordan Peel Deep Fark

National security expert Paul Sharre watches operational video by BuzzFeed using filmmaker Jordan Peel (on-screen R). (Rob Lever/AFP via Getty Images)

He also noted that speech cloning technology from texts will allow for the creation of “perfect fakes.” While most major providers have important controls in place to prevent fakes from being created, Locascio told Fox News Digital that some commercial providers are easily fooled.

Furthermore, Locascio said anyone with access to a reasonably powerful graphical processor unit (GPU) can build their own voice model that can support “cloning.” Some available services require less than 60 seconds of audio to create this. The clips are edited with basic software and are even more convincing.

Democrat senators targeting Ukrainian official Deepfark impersonators on Zoom Call: Report

“The paradigm of audio and video realism has changed. Now everyone has to assume that what they’re seeing is fake until it proves to be real,” he told Fox News Digital.

There is little criminal guidance on AI deepfakes, but attorney Danny Caron says it is said that victims still pursue civil claims and are eligible to receive financial damages.

His upcoming book, “The Legal Wellness Guide to Your Beloved Lawyer: Fighting the World Who Trying to Deceive You,” points out that AI deepfake falls into traditional honour-loss laws, particularly honor-lib losses, including spreading false statements through literature, photography, audio, video).

Ukrainian President Voldymir Zelensky's deepfake

This illustrated photo, taken on January 30, 2023, shows a phone screen displaying a statement from Meta’s security policy director. (Olivier Douliery/AFP via Getty Images)

To prove an honorific loss, the plaintiff must provide evidence and discussion regarding certain elements that satisfy the legal definition of defamation in accordance with state law. Many states have similar criteria for proof of honor and loss.

For example, Virginia law Deppv. HeardTrial, Actor Johnny Depp’s team had to meet the following factors that constituted a honour loss:

  • The defendant has made or published a statement.
  • The statement was about the plaintiff
  • The statement had slanderous meaning to the plaintiffs.
  • The defamatory meaning was designed and intended by the defendant
  • The circumstances surrounding the publication may develop the meaning of honor and loss for those who see it.

“Until you know what the law and the depreciation loss are, you can’t conclude that something is a depreciation loss. For example, Amber hadn’t heard. So I didn’t think she was doing anything wrong.

Karon told Fox News Digital that AI Deepfake’s claims could also be led by violations of privacy laws, trespass laws, civil stalkers and publicity rights.

Federal judges block California law banning deepfakes in elections

Bruce Willis Deepfake

The surreal image of Bruce Willis is actually a deep ferk created by a Russian company using artificial neural networks. (Deep Cake via Reuters)

“If Tom Hanks recently adopted his voice to promote dental plans, it is squeezing someone’s name, image, likeness, and in that case, sells the voice, in order to promote or derive publicity from someone else.

Unfortunately, problems can arise if the plaintiff cannot determine who created the deep fur, or if the perpetrator is in another country. In this context, those seeking to pursue a honour-loss case may have to hire a web expert to find the source of the content.

If the individual or entity is international, this becomes a venue issue. Even if a person is found, the plaintiff must decide the answer to these questions.

  • Can individuals provide it?
  • Will foreign countries help promote this?
  • Will the defendant appear in court?
  • Does the plaintiff have a reasonable chance of collecting money?

If the answer to some of these questions is no, then investing the time and finances needed to pursue this claim may not be worth it.

“Our rights are just as effective as the ability to enforce them like patents. People say, “I have a patent so I am protected.” No, you are as valuable as a patent can force it.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Brooke Singman and Emma Colton of Fox News contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *