DOJ filed fraudulent complaints against Judge Boasberg over Trump’s comments

Ministry of Justice He filed an official complaint alleging misconduct by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg. Fox News reviewed the complaints written by Attorney General Pam Bondy, Attorney General Chad Mizzel, and addressed the Supreme Court of Appeals for the Columbia District Circuit, Sri Srinivasan.

Fox News learned that the complaint was written and submitted to Attorney General Pam Bondi’s direction.

Who is James Boasberg, a US judge at the heart of Trump’s deportation efforts?

“The Justice Department is honored to file this complaint alleging misconduct by U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg for making inappropriate public comments about President Donald J. Trump to the U.S. Chief Justice and other federal judges who undermined the integrity and fairness of the judicial system,” Misell said.

Judge Boasberg has hosted a well-known case involving the deportation of several migrants to El Salvador, and spoke about being lightly emptying the DOJ’s lawyers due to allegations that his orders to turn around airplanes were not being followed. President Trump also made critical comments about Justice Boasberg.

The complaint commented on two opportunities that Judge Boasberg commented, and that the Department of Justice alleges that it undermines the integrity and fairness of the judiciary.

“On March 11, 2025, Judge Boasberg attended a session at the US Judicial Conference, which existed to discuss management issues such as budget, security, facilities, and more. Judge Boasberg tried to inappropriately influence Presiding Judge Roberts and about two other federal judges, a crisis. Trump administration We have always followed all court orders. Also, Judge Boasberg did not identify allegedly breached the court order to justify his unprecedented predictions. ”

Trump Enemy Boasberg orders DOJ for details of status of Secott immigrants sent to Venezuela

“Inside day Of these statements, Judge Boasberg began acting on his preconceived notion that the Trump administration would not comply with court orders. First, although he lacked the authority to do so, he issued a temporary restraining order that would prevent the government from eliminating violent Tren de Lagua terrorists. supreme court It was immediately vacant.

“In summary, Judge Boasberg’s words and actions violate the norms of US judges’ code of conduct, erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and ensure formal investigation. ”

Judge Boasberg orders Rubio to introduce Trump officials’ signal messages to the DOJ to ensure its preservation

The DOJ asks Judge Srinivasan to introduce the complaint to the Task Force as investigation is essential to determine whether Judge Boasberg’s actions constitute “actions of actions that harm the effective and prompt administration of the court’s business.” The complaint also seeks that Judge Boasberg is taken away from a lawsuit involving Venezuelan immigrants who have been deported to El Salvador.

The case in question is JGG v Trump.

This is the second time Bondi DOJ has filed an official complaint against a federal judge. In late February, the DOJ was Nicolas Talbott et al. v. Donald J. Trump et al. This is a lawsuit filed by two LGBTQ groups challenging the Trump administration’s executive order banning transgender individuals from serving the US military.

The news of the complaint comes when the Trump administration exced or expended dozens of so-called “activist” judges who blocked or suspended part of Trump’s executive orders from enforcing it in his second White House term.

Judge Boasberg, in particular, found himself at the heart of Trump’s rage, and this year’s attacks on so-called “activist” judges follow a temporary restraining order on March 15, which attempts to quickly block Trump’s use of alien enemies. Send hundreds of Venezuelan citizens To El Salvador.

Boasberg had ordered that all planes bound to El Salvador be returned to American soil “quickly” and “quickly” but that didn’t happen.

Who is James Boasberg, a US judge at the heart of Trump’s deportation efforts?

His emergency order touched on the complex legal narrative that what was brought before the court on March 15th ultimately produced dozens of federal court agendas across the country, prompting the Supreme Court to take two separate occasions to rule twice separately that rushed removals violated immigrant due-process protections. The US Constitution.

As a result, Boasberg emerged as a man at the heart of legal fallout.

Trump administration officials repeatedly exploited Boasberg for both of his orders and for trying to determine whether they acted in good faith to comply with his orders, and Trump himself came to the idea that Boasberg could be fired up earlier this year.

The complaint, which focuses on the actions of a few months ago, first taken as a judge by then-President George W. Bush in 2002 and the allegations surrounding Justice Boasberg, comes when he was able to speak up again in a major class action lawsuit filed by a lawyer representing former Cecot immigrants.

Class ACLU and other lawyers I asked Judge Boasberg earlier this month. The discovery of the incident resumes, citing allegations from the UN report on the custody of immigrants at CECOT and a recent decision to take 252 migrants sent to El Salvador from the United States to Venezuela under prisoner exchange.

When asked last week’s status hearing in court, DOJ attorney Tiberius Davis, asked whether the Justice Department would comply with the court’s order, said “if it’s a legitimate order.”

They also said they would likely seek an appeal from the High Court.

In April, Judge Boasberg also ruled that the court held the Trump administration by emptied the plane’s failure to return to U.S. soil in accordance with the March 15 emergency order, and the court said it had determined that the Trump administration had “willfully ignored” his order.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The U.S. DC Court of Appeals continued its original move in April, but has not yet proceeded with the issue.