Eng vs Ind 2025: Here’s why Rishabh Pant was primed in the Headingley test

England vs India The test series began with high intensity and drama, and it didn’t take long for tension to spill onto the field. On the third day of the Headingley test, Rishab pantsIndian star wicket keeper batter finds himself on the wrong side of the law after an emotional response to the referee’s decision.

Animated action of Rishabh Pants during the first innings of England

The moment of controversy occurred in the 61st of England’s first innings. On-field judgement Paul Fell and Chris Gaffanney Regular inspections of the balls were performed using gauges to confirm loss of shape. Such a check is standard in long format cricket, but the referee decided that no exchange was required for the ball.

Pants, but she looks dissatisfied with the call, Throw the ball and respond In a land of visible frustration – an act deemed rude by officials.

Read again: Elite list of five Indian batters in Away Twin Cent toe’s Feet. Rishab pants

Why were the pants responsibly blamed?

Pant’s actions were classified as a violation under the ICC Code of Conduct, particularly Article 2.8, which relates specifically to the opposition presented in the judge’s decision. With a prompt response, the ICC issued an official responsibilities to Pants. According to a statement released by the Governing Body, the Indian player accepted responsibility for his actions and agreed to the sanctions proposed by match referee Richie Richardson, thereby avoiding the need for a formal hearing.

“India’s Rishabhupant was officially responsibly for violating Level 1 of the ICC Code of Conduct on the third day of his first test against England at Headingley,” he said. The statement was read.

The disciplinary action includes one downside point added to the Pants record. According to ICC rules, level 1 crimes typically impose minimal penalties ranging from rebels to fines of up to 50% of the match fee, to one or two disadvantage points.

This charge was filed by the complete set of match officials – Reiffel and Gaffaney (on-field judge). Sharfuddoula Ibne Shahid (TV judge), and Mike Burns (Fourth judge). Their collective observations of Pants’ actions left little ambiguity in their assessments.

Read again: Is there the best wicket keeper batter in the history of Rishabh Pant India’s Test cricket? Numbers talk