Experts: Democrats misrepresent Trump’s Medicaid reform in new bills

Democrats Washington, DC, As Trump’s budget settlement package is being discussed in Congress, experts who spoke to Fox News Digital this week misrepresent the big criticism of President Trump’s “big beautiful bill” as a false fact.

“The bill will not cut benefits for people who earn below the poverty line, those who work 20 hours a week and don’t care for their children, and those who are Americans,” Jim Agresti, president and co-founder of Just Facts, told Fox News Digital in response to criticism from Democrats and Republicans.

“In other words, it cuts off illegal immigrants who are not Americans or fraudsters. The story is not based in reality. Currently, between 3% and 29%.

Medicaid reduction and reform is a Key sticking points Along with Democrats who combined data from two new reports from the Nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to back up claims that nearly 14 million would lose compensation. The White House and Republicans opposed it because not all the policy proposals valued were actually included in Republican law, and far fewer people actually face insurance losses.

How Johnson pulled away another impossible victory with just one vote margin on a $9.4 billion cut bill

Instead, Republicans argue that the reforms proposed to implement labor requirements, strengthen eligibility checks and crack down on illegal immigration Medicaid will preserve the program for those in real need.

“I agree,” Dem said. Rep. Jasmine Crockett I said accordingly Republicans insisted against CNN that they “want to die for the poor” with Medicaid cuts.

Agresti told Fox News Digital that Medicaid cuts aim to separate people from poverty and waste.

“We put some standards in order to say, ‘Hey, if you want this and you’re not in poverty, you need to work,'” Agresty said. “You need to do something to improve your situation. This is what these programs are supposed to be, not to free people from poverty and stick to it forever. So the whole idea is to get people to work and incentivize them.

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders It claims The bill is a “working class death penalty” to raise health insurance “a self-pay for the poor.”

Dems intentionally obfuscates the “truth” about “big and beautiful bills” in this claim: Watchdog

Agresty called the claim “quirky.”

“First of all, the big beautiful bill does not raise any self-pay for anyone under the poverty line,” he explained. “For those who are now crossing the poverty line, the state needs to at least charge some kind of out-of-pocket, actually reducing the maximum compensation from $100 per visit to $35 per visit.”

Under the current system, Agresti explained, “people basically have free reins, so they just go to doctors, emergency rooms or elsewhere without co-payments, and they are not exposed to poverty.”

“They’re wasting a lot of money at the end of the day,” Agresty said. “This has been proven through randomized controlled trials, the gold standard in social science analysis, and some people who have people in the lottery system benefit.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Anna Bahr of Sanders Communications said, “Agresti’s facts here are simply wrong.”

Sanders’ office added that “nearly half of all registered members on the ACA exchange are Republicans,” pointing to a settlement bill that Sanders’ office argued in the House.

“But workers will need to earn at least $15,650 to qualify for ACA market tax credits, which is roughly equivalent to the annual income of full-time workers earning the federal minimum wage.”

Sanders’ office states that “CBO estimate 16 million people will lose their insurance as a result of the House Pass bill and Republicans finishing the ACA’s enhanced premium tax credit. ”

Sanders’ office also repeated that the bill passed in the House would bring “a fundamental change” to Copay for Medicaid beneficiaries, shifting from options to mandatory.

“While I argued that I was ‘wrong, Sanders staff doesn’t offer a single fact that shows that the BBB will cut health care for Americans working,” Agresty replied.

“It’s especially funny when they cite the Obamacare subsidies expanded in this context, as people in poverty don’t even qualify for them,” Agresty continued. “After this ‘temporary’ Covid-era handout expires, those with incomes of up to 400% of federal poverty levels ($150,600 for a family of five) will be eligible for this welfare program, but will receive less. ”

Agresti argued that the “$35 Copay for non-poor people” has not been supported by research.”

“The association has not proven causality, as is commonly taught in high school mathematics,” Agresty said.

Sanders’ office told Fox News Digital: “Agresty appears to believe that four working families earning only $32,150 a year will not help provide health care. Healthcare in the US will end health care coverage around the world and increase health costs for millions, so workers are needed, whether they seek or exist.

Agresty also had problems with the story of not being able to cut to Medicaid without cutting profits to those who are eligible.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The government’s Accountability Office has come up with incredible numbers, and hundreds of billions of dollars will be wasted a year,” Agresty said. “Yeah, some standards to make sure that doesn’t happen are smart ideas. Unfortunately, there are a lot of white-collar crimes in this country, and this type of crime is white-collar crime. It’s not about having a gun or taking someone or taking someone out or punching them, it’s committed with fraud.

“And again, the big beautiful bill tries to curb it by setting standards to check people’s income. We check their assets. Many of these federal programs, government healthcare programs, have stopped checking assets.

Holy said Monday that he had no problem with the changes to the Medicaid marquee that his House Republican counterpart had hoped for.

However, he pointed out that around 1.3 million Missouri people rely on Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), claiming that most are working.

“These are people who work, not people who sit around,” he said. “Because they can’t afford private health insurance, they’re taking Medicaid and they don’t get it for work.”

“And I think it’s wrong to go to those people and say, ‘Well, you know you’re doing your best, you know you’re working so hard, but we know you’re robbing you of access to health care,” he continued.

Diana Stancy and Alex Miller of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.