Ju-dean reveals why Karen Reed escaped murder in the Boston police case

One of the 12 ju judges who cleared it Karen read The day after the second trial concluded with the death of Boston police boyfriend John O’Keefe, she explained the panel’s reasoning on Thursday.

The ju apprentice also described the brief confusion that arose from the verdict that the ju apprentice later retracted before being read in court on Wednesday afternoon.

Judge Beverly Canone sealed it off. Within minutes, the ju apprentices handed over the real verdict.

“All of that first slips were the same as the slips presented,” Jue No. 4, identified only as “Jason.” TMZ Live. He said they pulled the first slip back onto the OUI charge – working under the influence of liquor, and that ju-decided found her guilty.

Karen reaches after getting stuck at the first trial after reading the murder case

View: Interview with judge No. 4

“In our deliberations we determined that there was sufficient evidence and evidence that she was driving under the influence,” he said.

Ju judge I realized it wasn’t guiltyY’s murder, manslaughter, and a fatal accident in which he ran for more than 30 days of testimony and four days of deliberation began. Low OUI charging is a Massachusetts term for drunk driving.

“I don’t know what happened to John,” Jason said. “I was only presented with a limited range of what happened at night, and I could only base my opinions on the evidence presented to the court, so I really don’t know if there was any cover-up.

“I know it’s a big plot around, but I don’t really know. It’s just that there were a lot of holes in the investigation. Whether they’re intentional or intentional, it’s a bit difficult for me to sit down to know – you know what actually happened.”

He said the allegations that O’Keefe could have been killed by someone in the home in an attack involving a dog were “an example of reasonable doubt.”

“We were tasked with discovering… there were many holes in determining this person’s fate based on evidence that the Federation could present,” he said.

He said another important element for the Ju Judge was the video showing the taillights of the reading material.

“After alleged incidents, we could see the taillights lit up red, and we could see them from the car. “I don’t think the SUV had collided with John O’Keefe.”

Still, he added that there was no way for the ju apprentice to know if the “corrupted” police investigation claims were true.

“I don’t know that corruption is happening,” he said. “But do you know that there was no sufficient evidence or evidence secured by the police to convict Karen Reed?”

Also on Thursday, Massachusetts Police Brass broke his silence in a long-standing case that was damaged by the failed investigation and the firing of a state trooper who played a central role in the case.

Read is accused of killing her boyfriend by pounding him with an SUV and dying on the ground during a snowstorm, after a drunken argument, and is accused of killing her boyfriend. The ju judge discovered that she was guilty of driving intoxicated.

State Police Commissioner Colonel Jeffrey Noble said the entire department would represent that pacific dol to O’Keefe’s family.

“The events over the past three years have challenged our department to thoroughly review our actions, provide advanced research training, ensure proper monitoring, and take concrete steps to enhance accountability,” Noble said in a statement. “Under my direction as a colonel, the state police will improve in these respects and continue to continue.”

He said the goal is to provide “good” services and maintain public trust.

Get real-time updates directly True Crime Hub

The ju judges did not seem to trust the investigation after four days of deliberation when they almost completely refused the prosecutor’s case.

Massachusetts Trooper Michael Proctor “ends” from the state police

Chief investigator of the incident, formerly State Trooper Michael Proctor lost his job in March after he concluded in an internal investigation that he shared confidential and sensitive law enforcement information with civilians in group texts.

Follow X’s Fox True Crime Team

It was the nobles who announced their dismissal just days before the second trial of the reading material began. Her first trial ended last year at ju-degree judges after texts were read in court last year and the defence of the read exposed other obvious flaws in the investigation.

“Like all members of this department, it is mandatory for me to hold each other accountable when members compromise our mission by not being able to maintain our values,” he said at the time.

Sign up to get a true crime newsletter

Noble and the department were also sued. True Crime Reporter And some of the supporters of reading about the enforcement of the “buffer zone” around Dedham Court, which their lawyers called it unconstitutional.

Separately, local police in Canton, Massachusetts have been subject to an external audit that recommends increased training and surveillance, dispelling allegations of a conspiracy read for O’Keefe’s death.

Click here to get the Fox News app

A federal investigation into the lawsuit ended without charges against any member of law enforcement.