NYT is not responsible for Palin’s delinquent loss lawsuit, ju’s rules
Federal ju umpire ruled that the New York Times failed to honor former Alaska Republican government Governor Sarah Palin in a 2017 editorial in its latest update in 2017 Long-standing lawsuits.
Jujuku That decision has been reached After about two hours of deliberation after delivering the closing discussion to the civil trial in the Manhattan Federal Court. The trial was the second week.
In the comments Fox News DigitalNYT spokesman Daniel Rhodes said, “I would like to thank the ju judge for their careful deliberations. This decision reaffirms the important doctrines of American law. Publishers are not responsible for honest mistakes.”
Sarah Palin stands as a witness in an honorable case vs. The New York Times
Sarapalin’s team has yet to indicate whether they plan to appeal the decision. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP Getty Images)
Fox News Digital has reached out to Palin’s legal team for comment. It remains to be seen whether she plans to appeal the decision.
Palin, who became a national figure as the election of the late Republican Vice President of Sen. John McCain in 2008, sued the paper for honour and loss in 2017 after the editors allegedly mistakenly linked her to the 2011 mass shooting. Gabby Giffords, D-Ariz. , killed six people. The editorial was released in response to the 2017 mass shooting in the Republican Congress baseball practices that seriously injured R-LA Rep. Steve Scullyse.
Editors were revised the next day. Former editor-in-chief editor James Bennett took responsibility for rushing the story and apologized to Palin last week in tearful testimony.
The judge sets out Sarah Palin’s defamation case to be rejected, along with the New York Times.
This was the second time the New York Times was found not liable for the slander of the lawsuit brought on by Palin. 2022 unanimously federal ju judge He ruled in favor of publications US District Court Jed Lakoff had already dismissed the case. Rakov said at the time that the case would inevitably be appealed, so the Court of Appeal would benefit from knowing the Ju Court’s decision despite his dismissal.
This is the second time a Manhattan federal ju judge has ruled in favor of the New York Times. (Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images | Photo illustrations by Budrul Chukrut/Sopa Images/Lightrocket via Getty Images))
Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan This decision was reversed in 2024.found that Rakov’s decision to dismiss the lawsuit prior to the decision of the ju-joiner has qualified for a retrial lawsuit.
“It is not difficult to conclude that the verdict of the average ju apprentice will be affected if several ju apprentices already know that a judge has already ruled one of the parties that he alleges is charged with the charge of the decision,” Second Circuit Judge John Walker Jr. said at the time.
Click here to get the Fox News app