Tesla prepares taxi services in San Francisco, but not Robotaxis
It’s open to Tesla I’ve put my mind to that future Robotaxis. The company is currently planning to launch public automotive services in the San Francisco Bay Area. Tesla We call it the “robotaxi” service, but legally this requires the use of the car with a human driver.
The plan appears to place electric car makers in dark legal waters in US states with the country’s most heavily regulated self-driving car industry and the country’s most highly regulated self-driving car industry already sued for the misleading language of driver assistant technology.
On Friday, a spokesman for the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates state riding and taxi services, said Tesla notified its agency on Thursday that it plans to expand employee-only taxi services to friends and family employees and “select” members of the public. Technically, Tesla is legally clear to launch this type of service in California. I got it in March The “Transportation Charter Party” allows Tesla employees to take them on pre-line trips with the driver behind them. But Tesla is do not have It is legally permitted to operate autonomous vehicle-based services there.
“Tesla is not permitted to test or transport the public (paid or unpaid) in a self-driving vehicle (autonomous vehicles) with or without a driver,” CPUC spokesman Terrie Prosper wrote in an email. “Tesla is permitted to transport public (paid or unpaid) in non-autonomous vehicles. Of course, there are drivers.”
Business Insider First reported The Tesla told employees it plans to launch “Robotakshi” services in the Bay Area on Friday.
Tesla, vice president of AI software Ashok Elluswamy, said in a revenue call with investors on Wednesday that Tesla is “working with the government to get approval” for launch in the Bay Area. “On the other hand, we will start service with the driver’s seat while we await regulatory approval,” he said.
Legally, Tesla is not currently permitted to launch any kind of service on self-driving vehicles. In other words, the “driver’s seat” must be a driver. Tesla does not have permission to pilot self-driving vehicle technology even if there is a safety driver, Prosper said, “You cannot use drivers (autonomous vehicles) in passenger service.”
It appears that Tesla is talking from both sides of his mouth here. The company appears to argue that not only does it operate taxi services in California, it also suggests that the new taxi services are using “Robotaxis” and are proposing shareholders and Wall Street to be autonomous. Apparently, automakers have used techniques before. that’s right Currently in the administrative court In California, Tesla has been misinterpreting consumers for years, using languages like “autopilot” and “fully autonomous driving,” which states that it cannot drive itself but requires human drivers to constantly oversee.
“Tesla couldn’t have it both ways,” says Philip Coopman, a Carnegie Mellon University professor who studies the safety of autonomous vehicles. The automaker said, “By claiming California is Robotakshi that it’s telling regulators that it’s really not, it gives more ammunition for false advertising lawsuits.”