The real demon in Chatgpt
But perhaps the most compelling evidence suggesting that ChatGpt has refluxed the Warhammer 40,000 language is that the Atlantic continues to ask whether it is interested in PDF. The publishing department of Games Workshop, a UK company that owns the Warhammer franchise, regularly publishes updated rule books and guides for various characters. Buying all these books can be expensive, so some fans will try to find pirated copies online.
The Atlantic and Open declined to comment.
Earlier this month, newsletter Garbage Day It has been reported About similar experiences that a prominent tech investor may have had with ChatGpt. On social media, investors shared screenshots of conversations with chatbots. There, I referred to an occult sounding entity called the “non-governmental system.” He appears to believe it “had a negative effect on the lives of more than 7,000 people,” and “each of which wiped out 12 lives, completely pattern-traced.” Other tech industry figures say the post was created They worry About investor mental health.
According to Garbage Daythe conversation between investors and chatgpt is Science Fiction Project It was called SCP in the late 2000s and represents “safety, containment, protection.” Participants invent various SCPs (essentially creepy objects and mystical phenomena) and write fictional reports analyzing them. It often includes classification numbers, references to the constructed scientific experiments, and details also featured in the investor chat log. (Investors did not respond to requests for comment.)
There are many other, more common examples of what can be considered an issue with the AI context. The other day, for example, I did a Google search for “cavitation surgery.” This is a medical term cited in random Tiktok videos. At the time, the top result was an automatically generated “AI Overview” explaining that cavitation surgery “focuses on removing infected or dead bone tissue from the jaw.”
I have not found any reputable scientific studies that outline such a condition. Not to mention research that supports surgery as a good way to treat it. The American Dental Association does not mention “cavitation surgery” anywhere on its website. Google’s AI overview turns out to be drawn from sources like blog posts promoting alternative “holistic” dentists across the United States. I learned this by clicking on the small icon next to the AI overview. This opened the list of links Google used to generate that answer.
These quotes are clearly better than anything else. “It helps people to stand out about supporting links, helping people dig deeper and learn more about what sources on the web are saying,” said Google spokesman Jennifer Kutz. However, by the time the link appears, Google’s AI has often provided satisfactory answers to many queries. This reduces the visibility of troublesome details such as the website where the information was sourced and the identity of the author.
What remains is a language created by AI, lacking additional context and may seem authoritative to many people. Over the past few weeks, high-tech executives have repeatedly used rhetoric, implying that generative AI is a source of experts: Elon Musk I insisted His latest AI models are “better than the PhD level” and “no exceptions” in all academic fields. Openai CEO Sam Altman I wrote it That automated system is now “smart than people in many ways” and predicts the world is “close to building digital superintelligence.”
However, individuals usually do not have expertise in a wide range of fields. To make decisions, we consider not only the information itself, but also where it comes from and how it is presented. I don’t know anything about Jawbones’ biology, but when I’m trying to learn about medicine, I generally don’t read random marketing blogs. However, AI tools often erase the type of context needed to determine where people will pay their attention.
The open internet is powerful as it connects directly to the largest archive of human knowledge ever created by a world ranging from paintings of the Italian Renaissance to comments on pornhubs. After ingesting everything, AI companies have used their foreheads on the collective history of our species to create software that obscures its extremely richness and complexity. Overreliance on it may deprive people of the opportunity to draw conclusions from seeing their own evidence.