The Trump administration has opposed the court twice in a day, and experts say it could damage the reputation of the American star as an attractive place to invest in

• Trump administration It shows it is willing to rebel against the federal courts and even the Supreme Court, escalating conflicts that could lead to constitutional crisis. Experts say if Trump ignores court rulings, the US’s reputation as a safe haven for investment will fade.

The Trump administration’s recent willingness to resist courts could lead to a crisis that could undermine the US’s reputation as an attractive destination for investment, experts say.

While undoubtedly not on the scale of a full-scale constitutional crisis, Trump’s loose compliance with court orders warns that investment will worsen if faith in the judicial system worsens.

“If Trump ignores the court’s decision, it would be the end of the rule of law,” said Ian Farrell, a professor at the University of Denver. luck. “To put it another way, the United States does not have any laws for foreign investors to rely on. There will be nothing to prevent the federal government from seizing all of its assets without any reason.”

Even if rating agencies do so in a similar situation in other countries, it is unclear whether they will officially downgrade the credit value of US debt. Like Mexicohowever, investors may think a lot about investing in government debt, said Jason Delorenzo, owner of Ad Deum Funds, a registered investment advisor.

“I don’t know if rating agencies will be downgraded for that, but in people’s minds I’m sure government instability will raise questions about the riskless nature of the US Treasury being treated,” DeLorenzo said. luck.

Twice on the same day, it appeared that President Trump and his administration had rejected the court. First, the Trump administration Ignored federal court orders By denying the reporter from Associated Press Access to an oval office press conference with El Salvador President Naive Buquere. Trump has criticized it earlier AP To not adopt his recovery in the Gulf of Mexico.

Afterwards, Trump sat as a self-proclaimed man during the event. “Divineer“Bukel said he wouldn’t return Kilmer Abrego Garcia. I was deported by mistake He went to the largest security prison in his home country. Attorney General Pam Bondy said Garcia would. Don’t go back to the US Even after the Supreme Court upheld a lower court order that called for power. “Promote” Released from his custody.

It’s not the first time a US president has spurred the country’s Supreme Court, said Craig Smith, an auxiliary law professor at the Faculty of Law. In 1832, President Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court’s decision when he forced the Cherokee People to the west along the “Tears of Tears.” At the time, Jackson reportedly challenged Chief John Marshall, saying, “Super Court Justice Marshall made the decision and now he has made it enforced.”

Previous disputes highlight the key issues surrounding the Supreme Court’s decision that enforcement of court orders is primarily up to the administrative department, Smith said.

“Article 3 of the Constitution establishes that the Supreme Court has the last word on the law. The problem is that it and that there are few options in the lower federal courts regarding how to enforce their judgments and orders,” Smith said. luck. 

Through the difficult blast-each process, the president can ultimately be removed from power. Several presidents have been fired each by the House of Representatives, but none have been convicted by the Senate. President Trump was fired off twice in 2019 and 2021, but was eventually acquitted by the Senate.

For now, the dispute over deported Garcia has escalated the dispute between Trump and the Supreme Court, but both parties are stepping cautiously, said Stavros Gadinis, a law professor at UC Berkeley.
“So far, both parties are looking for ways to avoid this ultimate showdown,” Gadinis said. luck.

“Trump is cautious to argue that presidential authorities are legally stipulated and present his reaction to court orders as unrealistic or impossible (e.g., bringing back individuals who have been mistakenly deported), and the court is careful to avoid declaring the executive orders completely illegal.”

This story was originally introduced Fortune.com