Tom Cotton calls for DOJ to investigate Jack Smith for election interference

First on FOX: Senate Republicans hope that the Justice Department will investigate and potentially prosecute former special advisor Jack Smith for whether “illegal political action was taken to affect the 2024 election” against the president. Donald Trump.

Senator Tom CottonChair of the Senate Intelligence Email Committee, Smith accused Fox News Digital of representing special advisor Jamieson Greer of trying to influence his capabilities in his capabilities under the Biden-led Department of Justice.

Major Trump candidates stagnated by Senate Dem put pressure on GOP leaders

“The special advisor’s office is tasked with ensuring that federal employees do not carry out partisan political activities under the guise of federal employment, so it is suitable to determine whether Smith has broken the law,” the Arkansas Republican wrote.

“Many of Smith’s legal actions are Election Results for 2024 – Actions that violate federal law,” he continued.

Smith investigated the handling of confidential documents that were taken by former Attorney General Merrick Garland and later revealed during Trump’s attack on Mar-A-Lago compounds to investigate allegations that Trump had tried to overturn the 2020 election results.

“Hour by the Hour”: Senate GOP wants to end Epstein’s drama, but Democrats haven’t let it go

Cotton listed four instances during Smith’s tenure, accusing prosecutors of increasing the dates of trial and releasing information “without a legitimate purpose.”

In one example, Cotton accused him of quickly following the trial date and ju-seeker selection of his case against Trump in connection with the August 2023 charges that were part of the 2020 election investigation.

The indictment included four accusations against the president, including conspiracy to fraud the United States, obstructing official cases, conspiracy to obstruct official cases, and conspiracy against rights.

Cotton argued that defendants usually have more than two years to prepare for such trials, noting that the selection period for the ju judge is scheduled just two weeks before Iowa members in 2024.

He also accused Smith of skirting the usual appeal process and “didn’t be able to clarify the justification.” The court should grant his request when Smith demanded trial before Election Day when he visited Japan, and after hoping for a quick review by the Court of Appeal, Trump filed a petition with the Supreme Court to divert his defense to the District Court in December 2023.

How Trump’s “Non-Shrinkable Violet” DOJ is delving into Schiff’s mortgage transactions as legal dangers loom in

Cotton accused Smith of violating Department of Justice The “60-day rules” prevents preventing prosecutors from taking measures that could affect future elections. The charges stemmed from a move that was briefly filed by Smith following the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity granted on September 26, 2024, just over a month after the election.

And the summary, according to Cotton, was “confident at this point by other procedures,” including testimony from the Great Jury, which was usually four times the length allowed.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“These actions were not standard, necessary or justified unless Smith’s true purpose was not to affect the election,” Cotton said. “In fact, during Smith’s special advisor’s tenure, he regularly used a pretentious and offensive legal theory to prosecute candidates for president. President Biden adds that President Trump was called “confined” during the election. ”

“Of course, President Trump has been defeated. Joe BidenJack Smith, all Democrats who armed the law against him, but President Trump’s astonishing victory has not excused Smith’s responsibility for his illegal election interference,” he continued.

Fox News Digital reached out to Smith but did not respond immediately.