Trump administration denies us in war with Iran after being hit by nuclear weapons

Prominent Democrats, Republicans and several media personalities claim that America is currently fighting Iran following the president Donald TrumpStrikes against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic – but the White House is firmly pushing back to these claims.

The New York Times found reports of Trump’s Iranian strike in which B-2 bombers and other air force jets dropped “bunkerbuster” bombs at Fordow and Natantz’s Iranian nuclear sites as a US submarine fired a Tomahawk missile at Isfahan’s enrichment site.

The Trump administration denied that the US took part in the war with Iran and claimed that these were limited strikes, but that has not stopped critics and politicians from claiming that the country is currently fighting.

“President Trump has argued that the US strike against Iran was a “magnificent military success.” What we know is that Trump pushed the US into a new war in the Middle East with a significant risk of escalation,” says New York Times columnist Nicholas Christophe. Posted on X.

On the far left, anti-Israel voices condemn Trump Iran’s strike and dismiss the idea that he is an “anti-war president.”

NBC journalist Kristen Welker asked the vice president jd vance When he appeared in “Meet the Press” on Sunday, “Is the US currently fighting Iran?” Vance quickly denied that the US was at war with anything other than Iran’s nuclear program.

“No, Kristen, we’re not at war Iranwe are at war with Iran’s nuclear program… What we told the Iranians is that we don’t want a war with Iran.. We really want peace, but we want peace in the context of them not having a nuclear weapons program, and that’s exactly what the president accomplished last night,” Vance said.

Faced with the people on CBS Sunday, Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Marco Rubio It urged Iran to “choose a path of peace” and that the US had waited to see what would happen if their reaction was made.

“I understand What Iran decided to do. I think they should choose the path of peace. We are bent backwards to create deals with these people… We are ready now. If they call now and say we want to meet, let’s talk about this, we’re ready to do it. The president made it clear from the beginning… What happens next depends on Iran’s choice to do next. If they choose to go diplomacy, we are ready,” Rubio said.

Trump administration A series of strikes have begun On Saturday, they targeted Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities in Fordau, Natanz and Isfahan. The attack came after they tried to negotiate an agreement that Iran’s nuclear activity had not beenar fruit.

For more information about media and culture, click here

However, the administration’s fierce denial that the US took part in the war with Iran He didn’t stop the top Democrats – and even some Republicans claim that the country is currently at war or is heading towards one, or that this act should be considered “unconstitutional” or “perforable.”

“Trump said he would end the war. Tonight he dragged us into one. His decision violates the constitution, risks America’s lives and unleashes dangerous forces that we can’t control,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md. , He said in a statement.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. I slapped it Trump’s strike against the Islamic Republic called for a “principal war of choice” and Sen. Tim Kane, D-Va, called for a Senate war power resolution vote on “Trump war with Iran.” Interview On CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. , read in the “no more war” booing and chanting chorus from President Trump’s true social post, which announced at a rally in Oklahoma on Saturday that the US had completed a strike against Iran.

“I agree, and I want to tell you something. This news has not only heard you’ve just heard it, but I know that it’s very unconstitutional, but the only one that can bring this country to war is the US Congress. The President is right,” Sanders said.

Jonathan Turley: Dems suddenly gets mad at the power of the Presidential War

Progressive Champion Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said Trump’s decision was “base for each bullet.”

“The President’s tragic decision to bomb Iran without permission is a serious violation of the constitution and the powers of parliamentary war, and he is impulsively taking the risk of launching a war that may involve us for generations. Posted on x.

Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y. He issued a statement after the strike, saying the dangers of a “more devastating war” are increasing.

“The president should not be allowed to march this country unilaterally and do it as consequential as a war without precarious threats and strategies,” Schumer said.

“Donald Trump has failed to bring peace to the Middle East. He has failed to fulfill that promise. The risk of war has now increased dramatically. In a statement regarding x,.

The Trump administration also defended criticism from Republicans. Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky. and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) criticized the strike as a provocative act of war.

“When two countries bomb every day in a hot war, and a third country joins the bombing, it’s an act of war. I’m amazed at the mental gymnastics being carried out by the neocons of DC (and its social media bots). Massie posted on x.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Every time America is on the crisis of greatness, we are involved in another foreign war. Even if Netanyahu does not drop a bomb on the Iranian people first, it will not fall on the Israelites. Israel is a nuclear force. This is not our fight. Peace is the answer.” Green posted on X.

Retired General Barry McCaffrey also told MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace on Saturday that Trump’s strike against Iran’s nuclear program was a “bold and good move” in many ways, and we’ve been told.Now in the war with Iran. ”