Trump Warning Analysis – Non-Dollar Payment Systems that are not pioneering Africa


By Duncan Miliri

Nairobi (Reuters) – Promoting Africa’s local currency payment system – was only a misunderstanding at one time – finally gaining concrete benefits, bringing the promise of costly trade to the continent that has long been hampered by resource-supporting dollar trading.

But efforts to leave the dollar face strong opposition and threats of retaliation from President Donald Trump, who is determined to maintain it as the dominant currency of global trade.

Africa’s move to create greenback-independent payment systems reflects a push by China to develop a financial system independent of Western institutions. Countries like Russia, which are facing economic sanctions, are also keen on replacing the dollar.

But the movement has gained a sense of urgency after President Trump returned to the White House due to changes in trade patterns and geopolitical realignment, but African advocates for payment alternatives have made claims based on costs.

“Our goal is not to derail what people might think,” says Mike Ogbal, CEO of Pan Africa’s Payments and Settlement Systems.

“If you look at the African economy, you can see that third-party global currencies are struggling with availability to resolve transactions,” he said.

Commercial banks in Africa typically rely on overseas counterparts through so-called correspondent banking relationships to promote international payment settlements. That includes payments for African neighbours.

This has significantly increased Africa’s trade, along with other factors such as inadequate transport infrastructure, according to the UN Trade and Development Organization, as well as 50% higher than the global average.

It is also one reason why much of Africa’s trade (84%) is in external partners rather than between African countries, according to a report by the Mauritius-based MCB Group.

“The existing financial networks, primarily dollar-based, are inherently ineffective and more expensive for Africa,” says Daniel McDowell, a professor at Syracuse University in New York, who specializes in international finance.

Homemade system

Data compiled by PAPSS shows that under the existing correspondent banking system, a $200 million trade between two parties from different African countries costs between 10% and 30% of the value of the transaction.

The transition to a home country payment system could reduce the cost of that transaction to just 1%.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *