Trump’s deportation victory is the responsibility of lawyers and activist judges to plan
newYou can listen to Fox’s news articles!
President Donald Trump has driven his promise to fix what his predecessor had broken. It’s a tall order. Joe Biden I trained.
At the top of the list was the southern border closed. Donald Trump He achieved it at the speed of lightning and lied clearly to Biden’s claim that Executive Fiat couldn’t do it. The Americans cheered.
Trump then overdrives another promise to deport people in the United States, particularly violent criminals and terrorist gang members. Democrats ran to federal court to defend their defense, not because they liked thugs and terrorists, but because they were dimming over Trump.
President Donald Trump and Judge James Boasberg (Getty Images)
Their uncruel and careful trick was to shop until they found a liberal jurist to their taste. It worked like a charm.
Democrats know that “judicial shopping” is anti-democratic and wrong
Activist judge They handed out suppression orders and injunctions like Halloween treats. The Trump-hating media, as normal, with myopia, was celebrated with reckless abandonment. But the parade of confetti they threw for themselves was fleeting.
In a short order, district court judges find themselves plagued by reversals to manipulate the law and abuse their authority. It was all very predictable.
And that doesn’t stop. Every time another lawsuit appears – sometimes every day – it forces Trump’s Justice Department to play a ridiculous “Wack a Mall” game.
For those looking to maintain their score, here are three of the latest cases of this popular arcade traction:
Garcia deportation case
Kilmar Abrego Garcia was picked up by immigration and customs enforcement (ICE) and was illegally in the United States and was given a one-way ticket to El Salvador from where he came. Despite early statements by a bystander lawyer that his deportation was a “administrative error,” evidence emerged to the contrary.
Scotus must stop the lawless obstruction of the leftist judge’s Trump agenda
There is compelling evidence that Garcia is either a member of the infamous MS-13 gang or was a member of the infamous MS-13 gang. According to Attorney General Pam Bondi, two different immigration courts agreed in 2019, but allowed them to stay conditionally. However, the group is currently Terrorist organization designated by the United StatesGarcia was subject to immediate arrest and expulsion. The prior withholding order was invalidated by the designation of terrorism.
The controversy over Garcia’s gang status became irrelevant when it landed on Salvador’s soil. why? Because reversing his deportation constitutes both practical and legal impossibility.
I don’t know, but even if I don’t know, Federal District Judge Paula Sinis ordered the Trump administration to “impact” his return to the US by doing so.
The U.S. Supreme Court introduced Xinis to a basic law school tutorial by reminding us that under our constitutional framework, the president orders foreign policy rather than judges. The High Court instructed her to “just respect the respect paid to the administrative department in conduct of diplomacy.” It was a hint wrapped in command.
Realistically, the US could try to exert diplomacy to “promote Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador,” as prompted by Supremes. But that’s not the same as ordering the US for his physical return. Semantics is important.
Court coup: End of district judge war with presidential authorities
This has all become controversy. At Monday’s meeting with Trump in an oval office, President Salvadoran Naive Buquere He made it fully clear that he had no intention of releasing the terrorist suspicions on the streets of his country, and had no intention of returning him to the United States without mentioning Sinis by name.
At the court hearing Tuesday, Sinis continued to move forward, making a seemingly resolve and chasing with his tail in a circle. If she decides to treat the Constitution as a collection of recommendations and treat the judge as merely an advisory committee, her false decision will once again land on the highest court stairs.
I don’t think the next outcome will be very slimy.
Halil’s deportation case
Mahmoud Khalil, a one-time graduate student and full-time Palestinian activist who allegedly lies behind the violent protests at Columbia University, has been arrested by ICE and is currently being detained in Louisiana, where he is currently being deported.
Again, his lawyer went “judicial shopping” in New York, but the illegal manipulation forced the case into New Jersey. There, Khalil was detained when his lawyer originally filed their habeas corpus petition (the right to challenge detention or deportation).
Does the Constitution really protect Colombian agitator Mahmoud Khalil from deportation?
Meanwhile, a Louisiana immigration judge ruled that the government could in fact expel Halil. This was an easy decision. Green cardholders like Khalil are defined under US law as “alien.” They are not citizens. Their presence in our soil is a conditional privilege, not a right. Under the law, “aliens” that support or promote designated terrorist organizations such as Hamas can revoke and expel green card privileges.
This evidence is considerable that Halil helped organize a pro-Hama uprising on campus. This includes aversive anti-Semitism, vandalism, destruction of property, and physical attacks on Jewish students and law enforcement.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has evoked the expulsion clause in immigration law, stating that Hamas’ existence and support for Halil is opposed to our national security and foreign policy. A Louisiana judge found this to be legally sufficient for his deportation.
Halil has not yet boarded an international plane. A legal dispute over the rights of the first amendments and other due process are still being played out in New Jersey courts. Depending on the outcome, his case could also circumvent the path to the Supreme Court in the not too distant future.
Many federal judges are beyond their power, but not the answer “Barge each!”
TDA deportation case
The most legally ridiculous ruling came from the Trump administration. Large expulsion of another designated terrorist organization, members of Tren de Aragua (TDA). Under the authority of alien enemy law, hundreds of violent criminals were arrested and dumped in prisons in El Salvador.
The liberal lawyers for five gang members, still held in Texas, flew bats from hell to Washington, DC, to do their usual “judge shopping.” It was no coincidence that the case landed on the rap of U.S. District Judge James Boasberg.
The absurdity of that order is self-evident. The judges have no authority to direct the direction of travel beyond American airspace. Nor did Boasberg bother him that he had no jurisdiction over Texas litigants. Uncontrolled, he declared a nationwide injunction to stop all such deportations. This was far beyond the strength of his very limited district.
In a big victory for Trump, supreme court He tossed Boasberg’s false ruling. The High Court recognized that he should not file a lawsuit in the first place, as it clearly belonged to Texas. In a broader sense, this was a stinging responsibilities to lawyers everywhere who are obsessed with “shop” like half the sales at Macy’s.
For more information about Fox News, click here
It’s not that buying will stop.
Boasberg, who has been taken away by the Supreme Court of Jurisdiction, is stubbornly clinging to him. On Wednesday afternoon, he announced he would move to retain the Trump administration for contreating criminals for not returning planes that he had no authority.
This cannot be compensated for.
It is a shame that Scotus did not seize the perfect opportunity to ultimately wipe out the abusive habits of district judges declaring universal injunctions that affect the whole country. For decades, both liberal and conservative justice have publicly criticized the practice. Ducking this issue again was unbridled, and their failure to act only opened the door further.
Sure enough, within days, a Massachusetts-appointed federal judge issued a vast order blocking Trump’s efforts to end his temporary legal status. 500,000 immigrants From Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti. Don’t worry about Biden creating the program through Executive Action. This means that Trump can finish it at the same discretion.
Click here to get the Fox News app
The Supreme Court is the ultimate backstop for planning lawyers and activist judges who are worried about imposing Trump’s agenda on purely political reasons. It’s time for the court to grow its backbone and end gamemanship.
Until that happens, “Wak a Mall” fans will be able to enjoy legal gymnastics forever.