Trump’s Russian sanctions strategy may take “years” to work and end the war: Experts

president Donald Trump’s The approach with Russian President Vladimir Putin was a much more dramatic turn this month when he not only confirmed his support for Ukraine through the NATO arms agreement, but also issued an ultimatum to the Kremlin chief.

The warning was published in a clear message: to enter into a peace agreement with Ukraine or to face hard International Sanctions Its top product is oil sales.

The move has been defended by some, but has been questioned by others who are debating whether it is sufficient to thwart Putin’s war ambitions in Ukraine. One security expert claims that the plan works, but it may take years to become effective.

NATO Chief praises Trump’s weapon sales as a “critical” move that could force Putin to negotiate

“I think it’s effective and he’ll stick to that strategy. He’s going to keep pushing Putin back to the negotiation table and negotiate in good faith rather than coming to the negotiation table.

“That’s something Trump would never tolerate,” Freitz added. “We see that this is only President Trump’s first six months, and this may take years to resolve.”

But Trump campaigned by ending the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. and Not everyone in the Republican Party He supported his approach when it comes to Europe, including steady Trump supporter Marjorie Taylor Greene.

“We don’t want to arm and sell Ukraine, engage in foreign wars, or continue the endless flow of foreign aid,” Green said in X.

Freitz pointed to Trump’s decision to attack Iran directly, claiming it reflects Trump’s ability to become agile as a leader.

“He saw his intelligence and realized it was getting too close, so he decided to adjust his policies. It was his first diplomacy,” Freitz said.

“But Trump also specified something very important. He told his supporters, “I came up with the concept of America’s first approach to national security and decide what’s in it,” Freitz added. “He owns this approach and will adjust it as needed.”

Trump says we’ll send Patriot missiles to Ukraine, Putin tells us a good story, then he adds that he will bomb everyone.

Trump revealed from the campaign trail that he wanted Europe to play a leading role in the war in Ukraine, but last week he rebutted a big topic from some within his party. Vice President JD Vance.

Vance opposed Ukrainian armament, saying in an editorial last year that “(IT) is not just a matter of dollars. Basically, it is not capable of producing the amount of weapons Ukraine needs to supply to win the war.”

Trump agreed to sell NATO countries They then raise the US arms that are being supplied to Ukraine.

“We want to protect our country, but in the end it’s a very good thing to have a strong Europe,” Trump said as he sat down with NATO executive director Mark Latte.

Security experts largely argue that Ukraine’s negotiating capabilities, and ultimately, the future at the end of the war, is will. Play on the battlefield.

On Thursday, John Hardy, deputy director of the FDD’s Russian programme, spokesperson of the Helsinki Commission, also known as the European Committee on Security and Cooperation, spoke at his defense briefing. Ukraine It is necessary to supply long-range strike capabilities that can impact major Russian missile plants and drone plants.

“Trump Changed the Game”: NATO enters a new era of brave under pressure from us, Russia

“Ukraine should not be restricted to simply shooting down ‘arrows’,” Hardy said. “The best approach combines both crime and defense. Ukraine should be able to hit factories that make “archers” and “arrows.”

“Putin will continue the unprovoked war as long as he believes it is sustainable and provides a path to achieving his goals,” Hardy argued. “By strengthening Ukraine’s air defense, Ukraine gives rise to increased costs for Russian war machinery, putting pressure on the Russian economy and exhausting it. Russia’s attack The possibilities on earth, we may be able to change that calculation. ”

But Fries, who is vice-chairman of the American Security Center at the First Policy Institute, said he believes the war will only end when an armistice is secured.

“I think there’s probably a truce where both parties agree to suspend the battle,” Freitz said. “One day, we will find a line where both countries agree to stop fighting.”

Ultimately, he believes this will happen by Ukraine’s consent Please do not join NATO With Moscow’s understanding that for a certain period of time, Kiev will be significantly armed by Western allies.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“I think there is a way to do this that will not be bothered by Russia to increase Western European influence in Ukraine and that Russia will invade after a ceasefire or truce has been declared,” he added. “Maybe this is a dream, but I think it’s the most realistic way to stop combat.

“We know that this historical conflict takes time. Peace structures take time,” Freitz said. “I think Trump will have an impact on Putin over time.”